Your Google PageRank could be better, Glenn
Glenn,
You're hurting your natural search results by not having a title for each of your blog posts.
For example, type "worst album cover" into Google and you'll find my blog Stone comes out at the top. (or "addicitve trash can paper" or, I'm ashamed to admit "israeli girls kick ass".)
Why?
The title tag is a (very) important component of how Google understands your website.
When you click through to the archives on Stone, you'll see the title of the post way up top there in your IE. But because Instapundit doesn't use title tags, Google doesn't rank your archives as highly.
The net result is that while Instapundit's homepage has a Google PageRank of 7 compared to Stone's 5; Instapundit's archives come in at 0/10 while Stone's weigh in at 2.
Why is this important? In the whole scheme of things it's not, but higher search engine rankings mean more traffic and more notice.
And who knows? If this post on the RX-8 showed up at the top of the rankings, or this one on Lilek's new book did, wouldn't you get more calls from advertisers like Mazda or commissions from sales on Amazon?
